Autumn Lehrke: Bus Rapid Transit in South Washington County?
A viewpoint column written by Washington County Commissioner Autumn Lehrke regarding the Red Rock Corridor Alternative Analysis.
The Red Rock Corridor is a 30-mile transit way that connects the southeast suburbs to the Twin Cities along US Highway 61.
In 2007, the Red Rock Corridor Commission completed an Alternatives Analysis that analyzed the potential transit way alternatives. At the end of that study, Commuter Rail was determined to be the long-term solution, with a short-term plan to increase ridership through express bus service. (Please note: Commuter Rail is not Light Rail. Commuter Rail only services first shift commuters, whereas Light Rail has all day service.)
Several things have changed since the Alternatives Analysis was completed in 2007. First, there are several corridors that are up and running in the region that we can evaluate the performance.
The Northstar Commuter Rail, Cedar Ave Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), and 35W BRT will have ridership data and operating costs to evaluate. In addition, we have 2010 Census data that captures the demographic and population changes along the corridor. Finally, the Met Council has updated travel information to consider.
It is very important that we are making data driven decisions. That is why the Red Rock Corridor is currently completing an Alternatives Analysis Update. The study will look at the new data just mentioned, update current costs/data for commuter rail, and will gather new data on an additional transit mode: Bus Rapid Transit.
Unfortunately, the original Alternatives Analysis did not investigate Bus Rapid Transit. Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) is very similar to Light Rail Transit (LRT). BRT was designed to mimic LRT. BRT will provide all day service to the community. This will not only offer flexibility for commuters, but it will also service many recreation opportunities. BRT also offers reverse commute opportunities for people who work to the south. Furthermore, BRT offers relief from planning a transit route. After a rider arrives, they wait no longer than 10-20 minutes, depending on the peak/off peak interval schedule, and the bus will arrive. Finally, the BRT vehicles are easily accessible. They are designed so that riders enter on a level platform. In addition, the vehicle design includes wider entrances and depending on the size of the vehicle, multiple entrances for ease of boarding. Basically, Bus Rapid Transit is LRT but on tires instead of Railroad tracks. The other major difference between the two modes is that BRT is typically half of the cost of LRT.
It is important to contrast Bus Rapid Transit to the proposed Commuter Rail. The two are completely different services. Unlike BRT and LRT, Commuter Rail only runs a few times in the morning and a few times in the evening to service first shift workers. It does not service other lifestyle routines such as grocery shopping or leisure trips to events. This is due to the fact that there is not a reverse trip or midday service for riders to return to their residence after such a trip. Commuter Rail is basically the same level of transit service that we currently have except on tracks instead of tires.
In 2007, Commuter Rail had an estimated cost of $366 Million and it was anticipated that the project would not come to fruition for decades. While out in the community, residents agreed that it is worth looking into a different solution that will provide a better transit service to the community, earlier, and at a reduced cost than the current proposal.
After the completion of the Alternatives Analysis Update, the Red Rock Corridor Commission will be positioned to make data driven decisions on transit improvements in the corridor. The study is anticipated to take about 9 months. There will be multiple opportunities for public input including online surveys, workshops, citizen advisory committee, and on the Red Rock Corridors recently created Facebook page.
As always, please feel free to call or email anytime with your thoughts or concerns. Autumn.lehrke@co.washington.mn.us or 651.430.6214.
Thank you for the opportunity to serve you,
— Autumn Lehrke, Chair Red Rock & Vice Chair Washington County Board
Cynthia Cincoski
8:31 pm on Wednesday, March 13, 2013
Here in Woodbury it becomes a real necessity to have a car. Mass transit should be a real option for everyone not just being available for commuters to the down towns. I have also tried to find info on the smaller buses that I see around town,but the Woodbury website does not,even have the names or numbers to call for them on it. So it seems that something that should be encouraged is instead being discouraged by an otherwise modern city.
Randy Marsh
9:25 pm on Wednesday, March 13, 2013
Woodbury is not a city, Cynthia, it's a suburb. There is a big difference in that only one can support (or even come close) public transportation.
fb.com/WCwatchdog
3:10 am on Thursday, March 14, 2013
For being the most fiscal conservative Commissioner I'm surprised you are 100% backing this. We of course appreciate the update; however, the biggest disappointment is the end cost to the local tax payers. The Alternative Analysis study was $1,000,000. The Environmental impact DEIS study is going to be $3,000,000.00. These are all costs before even one shovel is lifted.
Look at the other failed LRT and BRT lines in the state or nation... they all become massive tax payer expenses until they are eventually closed like the train cars from the 1920s... Just look at the Rush line in forest lake it was doing so bad they had to close a stop and lower the ticket prices to $3... I e-mailed Michael Rogers, the senior project manager for the Rush Line and asked how much a ticket would have to be to be self sustaining and he said they'd have to charge $14 and if they did no one would ride... (my point exactly) The only demand for these boondoggles is from people looking for free rides and have no understanding of the cost and future tax implications (pun intended;).
As an oversearer of our growing county debt of $167 million, why is it hard to understand this isn't a good idea? This is going to cost hundreds of millions of dollars and is certainly not "a core service of government." (to quote your statement on the last no vote you made for a $50K grant)
I hope you can do the research and reconsider the cost vs benefit of this project.