Friday morning we took a quick trip over to an area shopping mall to watch our 7th graders school band do a half hour mall concert. I’m always proud watching kids perform, and the teachers work their magic with those kids, and this concert was no exception.
This band was a unit, playing a medley of Christmas songs for quite a throng of us, likely heavily sprinkled with parents and grandparents of the student (our grandkid also had his aunt there. His Mom and Dad were at work, the former as a Middle School Principal a few miles away.)
Enroute home we stopped at a store on busy France Avenue to pick up some items, and decided to have lunch in a casual dining place across the drive. Meal over, we walked past one of those ubiquitous flat screen TV’s on the wall, sound off, closed captioning on.
I noted something about a shooting in a school, and the view of the top of a school somewhere provided by a news helicopter. We stopped until the closed caption at least identified where the breaking news was taking place, and saw it was in Connecticut, and drove home.
The rest is history, and as we all know, the massacre at the Newtown, CT, elementary school became the story of the day, and will now dominate for awhile the public and perhaps even the political conversation — and it is a conversation we all need to be involved in about our American reverence for rights, freedom and guns, regardless of deadly capacity.
We’ve had plenty of warning and even practice in this conversation: Not long ago was the Aurora theatre; followed by the assault on the Sikh Temple; followed by the attack on the business in Minneapolis; the Portland Mall…and on and on. There were similar events before; others still to come. Pretty uniquely American….
Random acts of violence involving guns. We know that such events trigger similar events. Someone, somewhere gets an idea….
The debates again beginning will be predictable, I fear.
After Aurora the on-line Patch newspaper editor in Eagan started a poll/conversation on gun control. I had joined the conversation thread then.
Consistently about 60% of respondents were against any kind of gun control, and were passionate about it; the rest of us were more or less evenly divided in favor of gun control, or at minimum of restrictions on guns and ownership.
Aurora passed, and on life went, but the poll remained and I was still on the list to receive comments. After each of the above incidents the comments began again. I just looked (early a.m. on Dec. 15) and there are 684 comments, with the percentages consistent with my above comment.)
I’m guessing that sometime today the poll will return to my inbox, with the predictable passions continuing.
Of course, the 60% against gun control is reflective only of those who take the time to present their point of view in a non-scientific poll. It is just a poll, and is so acknowledged there.
But at least respondents present a point of view, even though it is one I have always disagreed with.
If there is to be a change in gun policy in this country, it is going to have to be from the people, including the many who think they can’t do anything, and complain that it’s up to the politicians.
Not so.
WE are the politicians in this and so many ways. We have to be the leaders in this.
A wrong position on guns has for far too long been a political death sentence for our political leaders, and if we don’t like that, we’re the ones who will have to be, as Gandhi said, “the change we wish to see”.
Those middle schoolers at the suburban mall went home safely yesterday; 26 people, mostly tiny children, in a Connecticut town didn’t….
POSTNOTE: My favorite blogger has a good summary of yesterdays news about the CT massacre and the politics here.
Nigel
10:54 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
NRA claims guns don't kill people, people kill people. How about that.
yomammy
6:40 am on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
whens the last time a gun got up, loaded itself and went on a shooting spree...oh yeah....
Dick Bernard
11:10 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
My response to Nigel: In the blog post linked to at the very end of my post is this pull quote from a writing by William Saletan: “This morning, a madman attacked more than 20 children at an elementary school in China. As of this writing, there are no reported fatalities.
A few hours later, a madman attacked an elementary school in Connecticut. As of this writing, 20 of those kids are dead.
The difference? The weapon. The madman in China had a knife. The madman in Connecticut had three semi-automatic guns.”
Dick Bernard, Woodbury
yomammy
6:59 am on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
...getting attacked with a knive is WAAAAAAY better.....[rolleyes]
If I had a choice, I would say neither...but the point is, man will always find a weapon to use.
Susan
8:21 am on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Of-course you conveniently missed the point that the children in China are A-L-I-V-E. The children in this country are dead.
Dick Bernard
12:34 pm on Sunday, December 16, 2012
On wonders how long a time of reflection there should be on this: three days? A week? A couple of years? I recall there was something of a rush to judgement after 9-11-01. Wasn't much time taken for reflection then, best I recall. A good friend sent me an e-mail this morning with the following "we need to ask ourselves what would our governments and our fellow citizens be doing now if the Newtown killer's name was Abu Abdallah?" The time for reflection on rational regulation of guns has long passed....
Carol Turnbull
9:39 pm on Sunday, December 16, 2012
Fran G: Those who want us to "reflect" now and talk about gun control later know how short the attention span of the average American is, unfortunately. They know if we wait, once again it will never happen.
Mr. St. Martin (who of course has never been known to be "soap-boxy"): This should not be anyone's "pet political agenda." This is a matter of common sense. This deranged shooter did not pick his victims based on politics. The kids belong to us all. And referring to someone who has expressed sorrow about what happened in CT as being "insensitive" and "coarse" strikes me as, well...
Susan
5:50 pm on Monday, December 17, 2012
This is my second attempt, my first is still pending in the land of waiting to be approved. My apologies if it posts twice.
Dick, it's always nice to read your blogs - we seem to agree on so much. :-)
Of-course we are discussing this in our ongoing (never-ending) conversation on the other thread. I have come to a couple conclusions after having read more about the people that commit these heinous crimes.
1. The vast majority are men
2. Most have dealt with mental illness
3. They have withdrawn from society
4. Most have seen and fixated on violence against humans in our overly-glamorized world of violent entertainment.
5. They have easy access to fully or semi-automatic guns.
THIS IS THE DEADLY COMBINATION.
This could be fixed but it won't be. I have my theories as to why, but will let everyone come to their own conclusions.
My love, thoughts, and emotional support go out to all those hurting and who have been hurt by these senseless and horrendous acts of violence...
yomammy
6:52 am on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
and yet you only try to solve ONE of thoes issues. (it sure is politically juicy to ban those scary, evil guns...)
Its the lefts go-to issues to "fix" the problem.
Maybe we should look at WHY these happen. All these same guns were available for the last 50 years. Yet we had almost none of these issues 20 years ago. Its has nothing to do with "more" guns...its society.
I will point a finger or two...over precribing mind/mood altering drugs, extremely violent video games parents allow their young impressionable kids to play, broken homes, thug "music" glorifiyng drug use, objectifying women, and being in gangs...
notice dancing and holding hands is not on my prude list...
Susan
7:39 am on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
yomammy, did you take the time to read what I wrote, or did you just assume you knew what I wanted to do, or wanted to solve? I have written repeatedly that I do not want to ban guns...banning anything (think drugs) creates more problems that it solves, and oh yeah, we have the second amendment!
It's time to put away your sloppy, 'let's create some trouble' attitude and actually try to add to the conversation, please.
yomammy
10:25 am on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
no.
Susan
10:44 am on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Of-course you won't, because stopping your antics would be the grown up thing to do...
Rich Brington
11:30 am on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Hey Susan, I agree with you. We should also ban all fertilizers. Hell, just still me in a white padded room. Susan, you don't get it. The evil will always find a way to commit evil. Getting rid of guns will only restrict people who want to protect themselves from evil from having guns. The people who want to commit evil will still find a way.
Susan
11:51 am on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Rich, all you have to do is look at the comparison of what happened in China and Connecticut, on the same day, to see the stark difference. A knife - twenty children are alive. A semi-automatic gun - twenty children are dead. DEAD. If you can't see this, you are blind.
Susan
12:10 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Rich wrote: "Getting rid of guns will only restrict people who want to protect themselves from evil from having guns. The people who want to commit evil will still find a way."
Do these ranters even read what other people write, or do they just assume everyone on the left wants to ban guns. Please get your facts straight, I don't want to ban guns, which I clearly stated.
Geo Weyer
9:47 pm on Monday, December 17, 2012
Now the knee jerk fixation is on firearms. What concerns me is another reaction that will start or already has started to occur. Picking on, bothering, humiliating, and bullying the many quiet unassuming male introverted nerds that are in the classrooms!
Bruce Fisher
8:32 am on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Guns were made by people to kill. That is its only purpose. Knives, cars, and everything else that somehow kills was made for different purpose. We need to remember that and control those killing instruments. The slogan "guns don't kill people do" is just a slogan to cloud an issue and deny responsibility. It's a statistical fact that living with a gun in your home is a health risk not only to you but to those you live with.
yomammy
11:05 am on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
I will take that risk...you feel free to hug the intruder in your house...
Bruce Fisher
5:30 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Yomammy, hope you don't mistake a friend or family member for an intruder.
Kris Janisch
9:27 am on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
What about the talk of limiting the number of rounds in clips? Does that sound like a middle ground?
yomammy
10:29 am on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
tried already in the AWB that got repealed. Turns out it dosent stop a #$%bag from creating violence. Think "banning" pot...how has that worked.
I am not sure what the middle ground is. All my scary guns have been ever used for was target shooting and hunting. like 99.998% of america....
Susan
10:57 am on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Kris, I am all for that. There is absolutely no point or purpose for these other than to kill as many people as fast as possible.
We regulate food, drugs, toys, and all other products in the name of protecting human life, yet somehow guns are untouchable. Its absurd!
yomammy
11:03 am on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
sure there is a purpose...becasue they are fun to shoot!
Phyllis Jackson
10:38 am on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
No trying to reason with Yomammy....he doesn't want to listen to any common sense. Did you use an assault weapon when you went target shooting and hunting?? I really doubt that you did, plus tell me who needs these assault weapons and for what use, other than to kill people. I'm all for people having their hunting guns and rifles,but only the military and the SWAT teams should have assault weapons. Let's try to reason instead of being ignorant,
yomammy
11:00 am on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Dosen't sound like you are being to "reasonable".
Yes, I DO target shoot with my "assault" rifles. The are cased in transport , and locked up securly at home.
.
You erode rights slowly like this--- think of the frog in the pot...and it can happen for ANY right we have. You just keep telling yourself it cant happen to any other amendment...
yomammy
11:03 am on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Obama...the greatest gun saleman in history. lol.
Janet Hartje
11:13 am on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
I think if mental health care were as affordable and acceptable as say a gun we might not be having this conversation.
Dick Bernard
11:15 am on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
I'm always most intrigued by the people who comment with aliases - "yomammy", for instance. I give them as much credit as their anonymity deserves, which is no credit.
yomammy
12:14 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
dont care.
Phyllis Jackson
11:23 am on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Couldn't agree with you more Dick! If they were so adamant in how they felt, why use an alias. I call them cowards.
yomammy
12:26 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
yawn.
Susan
11:32 am on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
It saddens me that some find that target shooting with these ridiculously deadly weapons is more important than children's lives. There is no logic in this particular argument in regards to freedom, only the child-like, stamping their feet and saying "because I want it!"
It will be interesting to see what the Republicans in Congress will do....take a chance at losing their NRA money, or stand up and say enough is enough, we need some boundaries.
yomammy
12:15 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Another lefty go-to statement "do it for the children!!!!"
Susan
6:31 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
It's such a terrible thing to consider....our children..
Please keep it up, yomammy, you're telling us more about yourself with every ridiculously ludicrous statement.
Rich Brington
11:34 am on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Susan, go to hell.
Phyllis Jackson
12:12 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
I can't believe that cans are more important than our children's lives. What a ruthless people we have become. There are just some people that do not want to reason with anything....someday some of these people may have a family member killed by these guns that they so want to keep in their lives. Maybe then will they change, but I doubt it.
yomammy
12:19 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
she hates these cans!!!!
Phyllis Jackson
12:13 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Guns not "cans" in my statement above....sorry about that.
yomammy
12:25 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
And when you finally pass these laws and libs dance in the streets, with church bells ringing...The criminals will form a line to turn in their weapons and "clips" as the left call them.
Criminals are known for strictly obeying "laws" that are passed.
Maybe someday we will make murder illegal, and then we wont have to worry about being killed anymore!!!! ( I am soooo writing my reps to get on this serious "murder" issue!!)
Rich Brington
12:38 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Yomammy, so people don't agree with you but don't worry. There are still some of us who support you in Woodbury.
Susan
12:58 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Thomas, I mean RIch, I do believe you are the first and only.
yomammy
1:09 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
well.....thats one!!!!
:)
Scummy Liberal
7:05 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
News flash, "Yo mammy accidently kills best friend with his assault rifle , his next best friend, mistakenly thinking he was an intruder. He just stopped by , he said, to drop off some hollow points I asked for. I will put them to good use the next time I shoot my, new best friend, my assault rifle, he elaborated.
Kris Janisch
2:38 pm on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
Dick posted another blog today: http://patch.com/B-cHGC
Kris Janisch
10:05 am on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Let's keep it clean everyone. No person attacks please. See our terms of use: http://woodbury.patch.com/terms
LIVE-ANOTHER-DAY
6:26 am on Monday, January 21, 2013
yomammy rocks.