Rep. Kieffer: Home Daycare Providers Shouldn’t Unionize

Too many providers will not get a vote on a decision that will impact them, Woodbury Republican says.

On Nov. 15, Governor Dayton signed an executive order allowing an election to unionize home daycare providers.

This election will take place from Dec. 6-20 by mail-in ballot to selected homes. It will be coordinated, paid for, and have its results tallied by the unions AFSCME (Child Care Providers Together) and SEIU (Kids First).

Not every provider will be allowed to vote; instead 4,600 will vote for roughly 11,000 Minnesota licensed childcare providers.

Only providers who serve families that receive CCAP (Child Care Assistance Program) funding will be allowed to vote.

Some providers have said they would accept CCAP families but will still be denied a ballot. As a result, many independent daycare owners have expressed concerns over the fairness of this process and the potential lack of transparency and/or accountability in carrying out the election.

The Minnesota Licensed Family Child Care Association (MLFCCA) wrote to the governor asking for a fair vote that will include all licensed daycare providers in Minnesota. 

In Rochester on Oct. 24, I heard testimony from those in favor of the AFSCME and SEIU proposal and those who were adamantly against the formation of a daycare union. 

The union representatives would not answer the questions regarding “fair-share” dues and said they would have to wait until after the union is formed and a new board decides on that issue. 

Although the executive order states that membership will be optional (No. 10), Minnesota is not a “right to work” state, so the union could mandate a percentage of dues from non-members be paid (usually around 75 percent).

Who will pay for the additional dues owed to the union? 

Some providers may pass the cost to the families they serve; others may take it out of their own profit margin. Either way, the union gets more money and working families get less.

MLFCCA currently offers all of the services that the union says it will offer: training, pooling for benefits, and a legislative voice at the capitol for a $35 annual membership fee. I called MLFCCA to confirm this fee. I was also told the only difference between their association and what the union will offer is that they do not endorse political candidates.

At the capitol on Nov. 21, Minnesota Bureau of Mediation Services Commissioner Josh Tilsen testified on how the election will be overseen. Many questions were raised regarding the process of the election: Who gets a ballot, will there be clear wording about the impact of the vote, what is the timing to return ballots, who will collect them? 

Overall, the two main concerns are whether this is a legal process and why every licensed provider doesn’t get a vote? Rep. Joe Atkins (DFL lead on the Commerce Committee) stated: "If you are going to be impacted, you ought to have a vote." 

Proponents say that the union will not have an impact on providers who do not join.

However, in a letter dated Nov. 23, 2011, from the Department of Human Services (which issues daycare licensing), Commissioner Lucinda Jesson wrote, “…examples of these issues (that will impact all providers) include quality standards, and quality rating systems, the availability of training opportunities, changes to the state system of providing early childhood education services, and the monitoring and evaluation of family child care providers through licensure.”

Hence, legislative changes will affect all home daycare providers regardless of membership.

Testifier Cyndi Cunningham talked of questionable tactics used by union representatives at the homes of the providers. Complaints included falsifying identification of agencies, why a representative was at the door, and coercion to sign a card to join “Kids First” or “CCPT.” 

MLFCCA said they received several complaints of “intimidation” and told their members if they feel threatened to call 911. 

By request of the Governor’s Office, problems are to be reported to Katy Chase at MLFCCA.com, childcareunioninfo.com or Cyndi Cunningham (651-470-4857). 

Both AFSCME and SEIU declined to testify during the committee hearing—some say because of a threat of a lawsuit by the Legislature.

Since then, a lawsuit has been filed in Ramsey County—not by the Legislature, but by the childcare providers themselves.

What exactly is the message our governor trying to send to Minnesotans with this executive order? By comparison, two states rescinded childcare provider unions in 2011: Wisconsin and Michigan. Gov. Jerry Brown (DFL: California) recently vetoed a bill that would have unionized childcare providers in his state.

In a letter to the Legislature dated Nov. 29, 2011, Dayton defended his decision—stating that only those who work for CCAP families will be unionized. He also noted that many other non-union businesses are impacted by union-led mandates within those industries. Finally, he states that this effort has been blocked for several years, and this vote is a right to make decisions “among themselves for themselves.”

Too many providers will not get a vote on a decision that will impact them.

There is no reason home-based, independent business owners need to be unionized since the services are already offered. Moreover, people who have voiced concerns directly to me are at a ratio of about 80 opposed to 1 in favor.

Please contact Governor Dayton’s office and ask him to rescind or revise his executive order.

—Rep. Andrea Kieffer (R-Woodbury)

Beth-Ann Bloom November 30, 2011 at 10:37 PM
I find it hard to understand why Rep Kieffer and other conservative Republicans have their undies in a bundle over this issue. Providers who accept government subsidies have not previously had an effective way to address their concerns as a group with the governmental agencies that regulate subsidized daycare. This union of people providing subsidized daycare would allow them a legally recognized entity to look out for their interests. People not providing daycare and those not providing daycare (like Rep Kieffer) don't have a dog in this fight and shouldn't be voting or kvetching. This is a very legitimate way to address the government!
Paul December 01, 2011 at 04:13 AM
Mrs. Kieffer is upset because she is part of the Tea Party. She rode in on the Tea Party wave, and she's going to ride out on it, too. Out of the MN House, permanently, at the end of her 2-year term.
Markus December 01, 2011 at 02:52 PM
This is precisely why there should be absolutely no daycare subsidies. I am again being punished by the system. I pay my taxes so I can pay someone to go to work? The very premise of daycare subsidies is ridiculous. My wife stays at home and I pay my neighbor's wife to go to work. If there were no subsidies for these greedy unions to latch onto do you think they would be working their underhanded deeds? I like the "Kids First" moniker. Kinda reminds me of the "Yes To Kids" campaign in District 834. Any simpleton can see it is about expanding the union's grip and filling thier coffers so they can elect more socialists. Governor Dayton's dictatorial executive order is shameful. The unions are expecting payback for funding 17% of his campaign with our tax dollars funneled through union dues paid by us. It's pretty clear they're getting what they want. This will result in more government intrusion into private business and more union influence in elections. Exactly the opposite of what this state needs.
Dave Anderson December 01, 2011 at 06:12 PM
Markus could not agree with you more. Dayton's actions are pure payback for one of the last traditional, and clearly diminished constituencies of the DFL--organized labor. Day care providers--both subsidized and non--are currently one of the more regulated businesses in the state, operated mainly by independent small business people. The only thing the union wants out of this is more members to provide more involuntary contributions to their political lobby. And Beth Ann I respect Representative Keiffer for standing up to this blatant power grab by a dying special interest. I have skin in the game---My daughter currently spends a significant portion of her take home pay for child care by a provider who does a great job and meets all of the requirements of the state. But this provider--a business person who is opposed to this fixed election--understands that her success is dependent on her performance. Having a union for private providers of day care will do nothing to improve the quality and efficiency of day care, but it will benefit the overpaid union bosses and the legislators who willingly accept their legal bribes.
Bob December 02, 2011 at 01:34 AM
What happened to Democracy in Minnesota? Dayton and his unions seem to have taken a turn toward a monarchy. What is next? The NLRB filing suit against the MLFCCA? When will the union require the training and permiting of in home baby sitters? Perhaps each school district should be involved rather than the unions? Whe have facilities and workers who preform a valuable service to working families in the state. Let them work and provide services that can be afforded by those who work for a living.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »