.
Feedback

‘That Could Have Been His Head’

Woodbury couple to be honored with “Saved by the Helmet” award Tuesday. Should the state require motorcycle riders to wear a helmet?

His wife’s face “looked like hamburger.”

Woodbury residents Rick and Beth Jones will be recognized with a “Saved by the Helmet” award from the Minnesota Department of Public Safety as part of the Toward Zero Deaths program today, June 12.

They were , sending Beth tumbling through the air and Rick skidding beneath the bike.

The State Patrol officer who contacted Beth about the award said that if they hadn’t been wearing their helmets, they could have died.

“Absolutely 100 percent true,” said Beth, 41, who suffered broken bones in both hands and had to have plates and screws inserted following the crash. She had a fractured vertebra, her jawbone was dislocated and she had to have several teeth replaced.

“My dentist loves me,” Beth said.

Tuesday’s event—set for 2:15 p.m. at the State Patrol headquarters in Rochester—is meant to highlight the importance of motorcyclists wearing their helmets. Last month, one-third of the state’s deaths (seven) were motorcyclists, pushing the 2012 preliminary total to 15 rider deaths this year, compared to seven deaths at this time in 2011, according to a release about the award. Of these deaths, eight riders did not wear a helmet, three riders wore a helmet and four were unknown.

Minnesota law does not require licensed adult bikers to wear a helmet.

The Joneses crash occurred at about 9:30 p.m. on June 24, 2011, while the couple was heading to Rick’s 40th class reunion in Illinois. A deer ran in front of their 1,700-cc Suzuki, which they had purchased only a few days before.

“All of a sudden, here’s a deer looking up at me through the handlebars,” said Rick, 58, who has ridden motorcycles since the 1970s but had never previously been involved in a crash.

Said Beth: “The guy behind us said (the deer) was basically cut in half. It was pretty intense.”

While Rick had severe road rash from the incident, Beth was less fortunate—her helmet didn’t fit properly, resulting in more serious injuries.

“The number one thing about my story is: please wear your helmet,” she said. “The number two thing is: make sure you have it fitted properly.”

Beth—who only returned to work full time in March—said the initial report about the crash listed Rick as not wearing his helmet. It was in the ambulance with him, and when she was contacted about the award she told officials she would only accept it if Rick did, too.

Beth was transported via helicopter to a hospital in Rochester following the crash.

“So I had my lovely first helicopter ride,” she said. “I wish I remembered something from it.”

Beth was given a sedative, and first responders told her not to close her eyes.

“I said, ‘I’m closing my eyes to keep the blood out,’” she said.

Rick said he understands that motorcyclists want to feel the wind against their face, and acknowledged that there’s a coolness factor with not wearing a helmet.

“I’ve always worn a helmet,” he said.

Recalling the scuffmarks on her husband’s helmet, Beth said, “That could have been his head.”

 

Like us on Facebook | Follow us on Twitter | Sign up for our newsletter

Simon D June 12, 2012 at 11:01 am
Wearing a helmet while riding a motorcycle is certainly a smart thing to do and no doubt saves lives. The only downside I can think of is being less aware of surroundings. However, I do not feel it is government's role to regulate us here to make us more safe. Wearing the same helmet in a car would also no doubt save countless more lives. How about requiring them on busses? What's the difference? Where do we draw the line on gov't regulating what is "good for us"?
Kim Lemrick June 12, 2012 at 11:55 am
Requiring helmets is a no brainer! Four years ago my cousin hit a deer with his motorcycle and died. He was not wearing a helmet. I absolutely hate seeing motorcyclists on the road without them on. It's unfair to those in a car because what if, heaven-forbid, they wreck in front of me. I don't want to hit a person but I especially do not want to hit a helmetless person. Besides, if I have to wear a seatbelt for safety, why should motorcyclists not be required life-saving safety measures?
Kris Janisch (Editor) June 12, 2012 at 12:15 pm
Simon, you make a good point. I've never ridden a motorcycle. Does a helmet inhibit your peripheral vision that much? But you're right, you see places like NYC banning large, sugary drinks.
And Kim, sorry to hear about your cousin.
D Paul June 12, 2012 at 12:25 pm
I wear a helmet and don't have any problems with my vision, but I've honestly never ridden without one.
I did hear a rumor that Woodbury may ban softdrink sales over a certain size. Have you heard this one too?
Kris Janisch (Editor) June 12, 2012 at 01:47 pm
Got new photos. They're fairly graphic.
And @D, Ha! Hadn't heard that one, I'll be sure to grill council members on it at tomorrow night's meeting.
Sheila Cain June 12, 2012 at 02:03 pm
My husband rides a street motorcycle. He and two of my sons race motorcycles. He is one of the best riders I know. He wears a helmet on the street because it's the smart thing to do. He wears a quality helmet because, as he says, he doesn't have a $10 head. Helmets save lives. As much as he believes in wearing a helmet when he rides, he doesn't believe in a helmet law.
Jennifer June 12, 2012 at 02:22 pm
I absolutely think helmet's should be required by law. I have a friend who was in a motorcycle accident, and he would have dies had it not been for his helmet. There are about 20 stats that currently require all motorcyclist's to wear helmets, and I'm sure they can see just fine. When something so simple could save your life, why wouldn't you do it?
Simon D June 12, 2012 at 03:55 pm
Just because something is "smart" and "saves lives" is not reason for government regulation. Most automobile fatalities involve head injuries, even the ones where seatbelts are used, so why not require helmets in cars? How about eliminating the risk of drowning in lakes and rivers by outlawing use of public waterways? How about eliminating obesity by regulating healthy diets for all? Watching too much t.v. is bad for you, so how about the gov't regulate how much time you get to watch and what content your approved programming contains? I don't want a government that regulates what's smart or whats good for me. This country was founded on the premise of personal freedoms, not feudal lordships. Orwell's 1984 was written as a warning, not as an aspiration.
Kris Janisch (Editor) June 12, 2012 at 04:48 pm
I agree with you for the most part Simon. But what about outlawing drugs or not selling tobacco to minors? In some instances the state has to regulate, and many states have regarding motorcycle helmets. I am with you though, we must beware of the slippery slope.
Simon D June 12, 2012 at 05:46 pm
Kris, laws concerning minor protections certainly fall into a different category. This is because minors lack the maturity to understand the consequences of their actions. Laws concerning underage consumption, childseat auto restraint, and other protections are needed for those that have not yet achieved adulthood. Minors need to be protected from bad decisions by themselves and by their parents until they achieve the age of self determination.
Kris Janisch (Editor) June 12, 2012 at 07:40 pm
Right, I figured you didn't mean everything. And I've got some photos from today's event added. This also kind of reminds me of that backyard chickens debate up in Stillwater.
Kim Lemrick June 12, 2012 at 10:15 pm
We have laws and regulations on safety from the manufacturing end of things all the way down to the consumer. It's not new and they exist because stupidity exists. There are careless people and there are stupid people and laws need to apply for several reasons 1. because we are a society, a community and what one person does affects another. When you have a moment of darwinism who picks up the pieces? The EMTS, the hospital, your family? And your community. 2. Insurance. We share in the responsibility of paying for things like medical, life/death etc. If you have an accident and are killed or maimed because of your choices, maybe just one person isn't enough to affect us all but if many people make that same bad choice, it can get expensive for us all. 3. Sometimes what stupid thing you might choose to do can hurt or kill another person. It's one thing to be stupid in the middle of a forest, by yourself and harm nobody, but out on a busy highway is another story.
Shawn Hogendorf (Editor) June 12, 2012 at 10:53 pm
So after reading this story, I have a question for those who support regulation:
If helmets were required, do you believe the government should have a provision in the law that requires the helmet fit correctly and is up to some predetermined safety standards? If so, how would that be regulated or enforced? Who would create and update the standards?
Chadwick June 13, 2012 at 04:05 pm
Couldn't agree more Simon. I completely agree that is a good idea but the government needs to let people live their own lives.
Kris Janisch (Editor) June 13, 2012 at 04:43 pm
CBS Local posted its video: http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2012/06/12/couple-awarded-for-wearing-life-saving-helmets/#.T9i6F9jpiZk.twitter
Naomi D June 14, 2012 at 10:08 pm
I have no doubt that their helmets saved them, Beth Jones and I had lost our 35 year old sister to Bechet's only months before (April 2, 2011) this accident happened with the motorcycle. Our father John, was an avid motorcyclist and always had a helmet on plus any passengers. He instilled in all of us children that it was important. I am grateful that Beth and RIck were smart enough to wear protective gear.
The thing that was most frightening when this accident happened was when we went to Rochester to see Beth and RIck in the hospital was Beth was air flown and had no id on her. It was in the back of the motorcycle. So when my husband and I got to the Mayo she was not listed as a patient by her name. After losing my other sister just months before I was so frightened. We found Rick and he was able to tell us where she was. Beth had great spirits that night we went to visit the first thing she said was "how do you like my make up". She definitely got her sense of humor form our father. I love you both Beth and Rick. So glad Becky (our sister) was their guardian angel that night.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Woodbury Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Photo by, Andrews Photography, garage on fire after explosive crash
Kris Janisch (Editor) June 19, 2013 at 11:02 am
Here's the story so far on Oakdale Patch:Read More http://oakdale.patch.com/groups/police-and-fire/p/breaking-helicopter-slams-into-garage-near-oakdale-maplewood-border
kok June 18, 2013 at 11:21 am
Can you be more specific as to where in Woodbury Bella went missing?
Kris Janisch (Editor) June 18, 2013 at 12:00 pm
I emailed Amy. The dog has been found.